Professor notes about Kant’s Synthesis of Empiricism and Rationalism

Question: Describe about Kants Synthesis of Empiricism and Rationalism? Answer: Introduction The paper reflects on the two methods in order to approach the problems of current philosophy such as rationalism and empiricism. First, the researcher attempted to explain the theories of knowledge in both rationalisms as well as empiricism. Both of these methods contribute to the demystification of understanding through their perceptive philosophies. The thesis statement of this study reveals that how Kants synthesis of rationalism, as well as empiricism, results in criticism. Kants Synthesis of Empiricism and Rationalism Kant desires to keep both empiricism and rationalism, assumed that the senses convey to the intellect the thing that is understood by the sense of the understanding (Kant). Using these two philosophical methods, Kant claims that our observations, which are the demonstration of the sensations, bring to be known the subject, which is plugged into prior types of understandings (Bozzo). Kant said that most interesting and required ranges of human knowledge relied upon "synthetic a priori judgments." It is possible when the mind concludes the conditions of its knowledge. It is seen that the brilliance of Kant is the synthesis argues of empiricist through the claims of the rationalist. It is a synthesis of what is to be claimed is the initial starting place of the knowledge. Rationalism is the theoretical viewpoint of the knowledge, which beliefs the perfectibility of the individual reason. Due to a school of thinking, rationalism disagrees that both the methods claim that the world is seized by the capability of prior cause without the necessitate on the sense experience. Vanzo opined that a person, who holds to rationalism, is very optimistic about the control of reason as well as they have a great regard to their fate based on the assumption that they think clearly as well as distinctly. This system appeared in various period, but this system mainly achieves the highest level during 17th and 18th century. Empiricism follows the Aristotle's dictum such as "There is nothing in the intellect that was not first in the senses." By this argument, it focuses on the truth claims about the reality if it is verified through sense-experience. Bozzo opined that a consistent rationalist ends up in dogmatism as because the use of reason without an antecedent analyze of its capacity. Kant defends against the empiricist as because there is a reduction in all the knowledge to experience (Brittan). As Kant agrees with the concept of rationalist, therefore there is prior cognitions empiricism that ends up in skepticism as because there is an impossibility of universal as well as required judgment. Conclusion It is concluded that the problems of empiricism, as well as rationalism, is resulting from the relevant fundamentals principles that describe the faculties through which the knowledge is gained. Empiricism is defined by the importance of the posterior conclusions as well as awareness gained commencing which it is encountered in knowledge. However, rationalism is the highlighting on the movement of the mind in order to grow knowledge from the sources outside the instant scale of knowledge as well as sense perception. References Bozzo, Alexander. "The Cambridge Companion to Kants Critique of Pure Reason."Kant-Studien106.1 (2015): 136-142. Brittan Jr, Gordon G.Kant's theory of science. Princeton University Press, 2015. Kant, Immanuel. "Critique of Pure Reason, A270/B326A278/B334 (excerpt)."Consciousness in the Physical World: Perspectives on Russellian Monism(2015): 19. Vanzo, Alberto. "Kant on empiricism and rationalism."History of Philosophy Quarterly30.1 (2013): 53-74.